Himalaya's Liv.52 GNX is a proprietary Ayurvedic blend marketed for liver support, delivering just 250mg of herbs across five plant extracts per daily dose. The lead ingredient, **Eclipta alba** (False daisy), makes up over half the blend at 142.5mg — it has traditional use for liver health but lacks well-designed RCTs establishing an effective dose range. The remaining herbs are present in small amounts that fall well below studied levels.
**Andrographis paniculata**, primarily researched for immune support rather than liver function, is dosed at 17.5mg — roughly 9% of the minimum clinical dose (200mg standardized extract). **Cichorium intybus** (Chicory), which has preliminary evidence for reducing liver enzymes, provides just 15mg versus the 1,000mg minimum used in clinical trials. Neither ingredient is present at a level likely to deliver meaningful benefit.
The biggest limitation is the total blend size. At 250mg split across five herbs, you're getting micro-doses of everything rather than a clinical dose of anything. If liver support is your goal, you'd want to look for products that deliver individual ingredients at their studied doses rather than trace amounts spread across a blend.
BioStacks
Other Ingredients (10)
Polysorbate 80Emulsifier
Chassaing et al. 2015 (Nature, PMID 25731162) tested polysorbate 80 directly and showed it thinned the gut mucus barrier, altered microbiota composition, and induced low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome in mice. The strongest human evidence is for a related emulsifier rather than polysorbate 80 itself: Chassaing 2022 (Gastroenterology, PMID 34774538) was a controlled human feeding RCT of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) that found microbial encroachment into the mucus layer — polysorbate 80 has not been tested in an equivalent human trial. In vitro work (e.g. Roberts 2010) shows polysorbate 80 enhances bacterial translocation across intestinal epithelium, and observational data link overall dietary-emulsifier exposure to IBD risk. EFSA is mid re-evaluation of polysorbates (E432–E436). For a supplement excipient with purely cosmetic function (improving the look/texture of soft gels and liquids), the gut-barrier risk profile is unfavorable when safer alternatives (sunflower lecithin, MCT carriers, gum acacia) are widely available.
TalcAnti-caking
IARC classifies cosmetic-grade talc not containing asbestos as Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans); perineal talc use as Group 2A (probably carcinogenic). Johnson & Johnson voluntarily withdrew talc-based baby powder from US/Canada in 2020 and globally in 2022 after extensive litigation tied to ovarian-cancer and mesothelioma cases. The 2018 FDA contamination survey found asbestos in 9 of 52 cosmetic talc products tested. As a supplement excipient talc is a pure manufacturing convenience — no nutritional or functional benefit to the user — so the asbestos-exposure risk has no offsetting upside. Safer alternatives (silicon dioxide, microcrystalline cellulose, rice hulls) are widely available.
Polyethylene Glycol (Coating)Coating
A polyether polymer used as a tablet coating and plasticizer
Magnesium StearateLubricant
A salt of stearic acid used as a lubricant in tablet and capsule production
Polyvinyl AlcoholCoating
Synthetic, water-soluble polymer used as a film former and binder in immediate-release tablet coatings
Silicon DioxideAnti-caking
Fine silica powder used to prevent clumping
Microcrystalline CelluloseBinder
Plant-derived cellulose used as a binder and filler in supplements
CrospovidoneDisintegrant
Cross-linked synthetic polymer used as a tablet disintegrant to help tablets break apart quickly in the stomach
Track this supplement in your stack
Get personalized insights, interactions, and coverage recommendations.
Get Started FreeSimilar Supplements
Products that cover similar health dimensions based on their ingredients.
Sources & Scoring
Nutrient data (RDA, UL, and safety thresholds) sourced from: NIH Office of Dietary Supplements and National Academies Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI).
This is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider before making changes to your supplement routine.
The score analyzes what's on the label: ingredient doses vs. clinical ranges, chemical forms, evidence levels, and known interactions. It does not verify label accuracy or test for contaminants — for that, look for third-party certifications like USP or NSF.